Regular Article
Management practices that concentrate visitor activities: camping impact management at Isle Royale National Park, USA

https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2002.0584Get rights and content

Abstract

This study assessed campsite conditions and the effectiveness of campsite impact management strategies at Isle Royale National Park, USA. Protocols for assessing indicators of vegetation and soil conditions were developed and applied to 156 campsites and 88 shelters within 36 backcountry campgrounds. The average site was 68 m2 and 83% of sites lost vegetation over areas less than 47 m2. We believe that management actions implemented to spatially concentrate camping activities and reduce camping disturbance have been highly successful. Comparisons of disturbed area/overnight stay among other protected areas reinforces this assertion. These reductions in area of camping disturbance are attributed to a designated site camping policy, limitation on site numbers, construction of sites in sloping terrain, use of facilities, and an ongoing program of campsite maintenance. Such actions are most appropriate in higher use backcountry and wilderness settings.

References (38)

  • D. Boose

    Personal Communications

    (1997)
  • Bratton, S.P. Hickler, M.G. Graves, J.H. 1978, Trail and Campsite Erosion Survey for Great Smoky Mountains National...
  • D.N. Cole

    Managing ecological impacts at wilderness campsites: an evaluation of techniques

    Journal of Forestry

    (1981)
  • D.N. Cole

    Research on soil and vegetation in wilderness: a state-of-knowledge review

    Proceedings—National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, State-of-Knowledge, Future Directions, July 23–26, 1985, Fort Collins, CO (Lucas, R. C., comp.)

    (1987)
  • D.N. Cole

    Area of Vegetation Loss: A New Index of Campsite Impact

    (1989)
  • D.N. Cole

    Wilderness Campsite Monitoring Methods: A Sourcebook

    (1989)
  • D.N. Cole

    Modeling wilderness campsites: factors that influence amount of impact

    Environmental Management

    (1992)
  • D.N. Cole

    Wilderness management principles: Science, logical thinking or personal opinion?

    Trends

    (1995)
  • Cole, D.N. Hall, T.E. 1992, Trends in Campsite Condition: Eagle Cap Wilderness, Bob Marshall Wilderness, and Grand...
  • Cole, D.N. Petersen, M.E. Lucas, R.C. 1987, Managing Wilderness Recreation Use: Common Problems and Potential...
  • Cole, D.N. Watson, A.E. Hall, T.E. Spildie, D.R. 1997, High-Use Destinations in Wilderness: Social and Biophysical...
  • Farrell, T.A. Marion, J.L. 1998, An Evaluation of Camping Impacts and their Management at Isle Royale National Park,...
  • Farrell, T.A. Marion, J.L. 2000, Camping impact management at Isle Royale National Park: An evaluation of visitor...
  • W.E. Hammitt et al.

    Wildland Recreation: Ecology and Management (2nd edn)

    (1998)
  • J.C. Hendee et al.

    Wilderness Management

    (1990)
  • J. Hultsman et al.

    Planning Parks for People

    (1998)
  • F.R. Kuss et al.

    Visitor Impact Management: A Review of Research

    (1990)
  • R.E. Leonard et al.

    Backcountry Facilities: Design and Maintenance

    (1991)
  • Leung, Y.-F. Marion, J.L. 1995, A Survey of Campsite Conditions in Eleven Wilderness Areas of the Jefferson National...
  • Cited by (58)

    • Modeling areal measures of campsite impacts on the Appalachian National Scenic Trail to enhance ecological sustainability

      2021, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      This study is restricted to resource impacts associated with the areal extent of trampling impacts, including the size and area of vegetation loss on overnight campsites. A common management objective is to minimize aggregate camping impacts through actions that reduce the “footprint” or areal extent of intensive camping impact, in part because smaller sites have less vegetation loss, soil exposure and erosion, or damaged and felled trees (Cole, 1989, 1992; Marion, 2016; Marion and Farrell, 2002; Smith and Newsome, 2002). Campsite and experimental trampling studies indicate the majority of herbaceous vegetation is lost at initial and low levels of camping activity, with diminishing per capita losses as use increases to moderate and high levels (Cole, 1995; Cole and Monz, 2003; Growcock and Pickering, 2011; Marion et al., 2016).

    • The efficacy of combined educational and site management actions in reducing off-trail hiking in an urban-proximate protected area

      2017, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      A common strategy to achieve a balance between recreation and conservation goals is through provision of a recreational infrastructure of trails and recreation sites that concentrate traffic on hardened durable substrates (Eagles et al., 2002; Marion, 2016; Marion and Leung, 2004). Many of these facilities are sustainably located and designed to shield and protect sensitive natural resources from visitor pressure (Marion, 2016; Marion and Farrell, 2002). However, the effectiveness of this spatial containment strategy is compromised when visitors travel away from the formal infrastructure in sufficient numbers to create informal trails and sites (Cole et al., 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    f1

    Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

    View full text